DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
dc.contributor.author | 釋堅融 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-04T06:50:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-04T06:50:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.dila.edu.tw//handle/123456789/1091 | - |
dc.description | 收稿日期:2021/7/28;通過審核日期:2021/11/5。
本文使用中華電子佛典協會發行之 CBETA 2019.Q3 版從事語料檢索與引用,引文的標點符號已由筆者重新調整。論文初稿〈教學視角下的《華嚴綸貫》〉曾於中華佛學研究所主辦的「2019 漢傳佛教研究和教育的實務開展圓桌論壇」(法鼓山,2019年9月20日)宣讀,內容已相當幅度增修改寫。本研究承蒙二位匿名審查人惠賜寶貴評論和修改建議,受惠良多,謹此特致謝意。未臻完善之處,文責皆在筆者。 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | 知識簡化涉及節選,而選擇背後必有特定考量或立場。單就總括概覧的特性而言,傳統釋氏典籍不乏系統分科、鉤玄提要的教學用書。以華嚴宗為例,卷帙浩繁的《華嚴經》實非初學者得以迅速掌握,歷代注疏也頗為博奧龐雜,執簡馭繁的綱要書由之應運而生。宋代復菴撰《華嚴綸貫》(或作《華嚴經綸貫》)一卷,全書僅以四千多字勾勒出《華嚴經》的梗概。當代華嚴宗傳人將之視為瞭解《華嚴經》大意的重要入門書,但亦有古德持相反意見。基於指引閱讀《華嚴經》的教科書定位,本研究透過現代教育學界所重視的批判論述分析(critical discourse analysis),解析《華嚴綸貫》所蘊含的編輯意識。
Norman Fairclough 的批判論述分析主要為文本意識型態的研究方法,主張:文本的意識型態隱藏於語句表現之下,而且文本在建構過程往往受到歷史或社會文化等外圍因素影響。《華嚴綸貫》作為一總攝《華嚴經》的概要性論著,經句的擇取、文義詮釋乃至引證必然帶有編寫者的主觀意識。本文運用Fairclough 氏的三向度框架(文本描述、論述實踐和社會文化實踐),從教材編纂角度解析《華嚴綸貫》構成樣貌,論說其編輯特色以及撰者的學術傾向,並從中省思教學者對於教材所應關注的多元面向。 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The simplification of knowledge involves a process of selection, which is based on particular considerations or a particular perspective. The Buddhist tradition abounds in systematic introductions to Buddhist scriptures. Taking the Huayan school as an example, The Huayan Lunguan, written by Fu-an in the Song Dynasty, contains just over 4,000 words providing a survey of the Huayan Sutra. While many contemporary followers of the Huayan school regard it as a helpful introductory book for understanding the Sutra, some ancient masters held different views. This study aims to explore the editorial ideology embedded in the Huayan Lunguan, taken as a guide to reading the Huayan Sutra. The study will take the form of a critical discourse analysis, a method widely applied to contemporary educational research.
Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis focuses on the study of textual ideology, asserting that the ideology of a text is hidden beneath its linguistic expression, and that the process of textual construction is often influenced by external factors such as history or social culture. As a summary treatise on Huayan, the interpretations and even the quotations in the Huayan Lunguan are necessarily subjective in nature. This paper uses Fairclough's three-dimensional framework (Text, Discourse practice, and Sociocultural practice) to illustrate the composition of the Huayan Lunguan from the perspective of textbook compilation, discussing its editorial features and the author's academic orientation. Through this case study of the analysis of the Huayan Lunguan, this paper discusses the various dimensions of teaching materials which teachers should take into consideration. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 一、前言
二、教科書的批判論述分析
三、《華嚴綸貫》的三向度論述分析
(一)文本描述
(二)論述實踐
(三)社會文化實踐
四、結語:《華嚴綸貫》教學的批判性思考 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | zh | en_US |
dc.publisher | 新北市:法鼓文理學院 | en_US |
dc.publisher | New Taipei City: Dharma Drum Institute of Liberal Arts | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | 法鼓佛學學報 | en_US |
dc.subject | 華嚴綸貫 | en_US |
dc.subject | 批判論述分析 | en_US |
dc.subject | 華嚴教學 | en_US |
dc.subject | 佛學教材 | en_US |
dc.subject | Huayan Lunguan | en_US |
dc.subject | critical discourse analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Huayan teaching | en_US |
dc.subject | Buddhist textbooks | en_US |
dc.title | 《華嚴綸貫》之批判論述分析 | en_US |
dc.title | A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Huayan Lunguan | en_US |
dc.type | journal article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6889/DDJBS.202112_(29).0004 | - |
dc.relation.journalissue | 29 | en_US |
item.fulltext | with fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | other | - |
顯示於: | 學術出版組
|