dc.description.abstract | Buddhism’s position regarding the relationship between mind and body does not involve a substantialist approach, such as “dualism,” “monism,” or “unity of mind and body.”Rather, Buddhism employs the teachings of the Five Skandhas, Twelve □yatanas, and Eighteen (or six) Dh(96bb)tus to teach sentient beings of varying capacities, accurately observe sentient beings’ understanding of impermanence and non-self, become familiar with the mutually dependent relationship between mind and body, break and remove the attachment to an eternal, unchanging “self,” and experience mental and physical liberation. Relating to Tjanatology, and the theory and practice of terminal hospice care, Buddhism also deals with the relationship between mind and body with its theory and experiences resulting from cultivation. Buddhism’s description of the process through which the five elements (earth, water, fire, wind, and space) and the five skandhas (material, perception, feeling, karmic formations, and consciousness)break down not only has some similarities with medical observations, it can also become wisdom for the terminal phase of life. Hospice care originates with Christian religious organizations. When the expression “caring for the entire person” is used, this usually implies caring for the body, mind, and spirit. From this, the concept of “spiritual care” has been developed into an occupation. This contrasts with the theory of “identity” with mind and body only, which may focus on either extending the lifespan or advocating euthanasia in the terminal stage of a cancer patient’s life. Spiritual care is thus established on something “transcending” mind and body, involving the existence of a “spirit,” which transcends the mind and thought. However, whether we speak of “identity” with mind and body, or a spirit which “transcends” them, this implies the view of an eternal soul, or self, which is different from Buddhism’s theory of non-self and conditioned arising. Buddhism’s view of life supports neither identity nor transcendence, therefore, the truth of life is neither annihilationist nor eternalist. Based on this middle way, a soul cannot be established outside of mind and body; rather, “Dharma” (truth, law, and duty) should serve as the highest objects of perception. Also, because “perception” is an element leading the “mind,” it is especially emphasized (unpleasant, pleasant, arising, changing, cessation, and change). This is similar to hospice’s emphasis on controlling pain and eliminating uncomfortable symptoms. Therefore, learning to be aware of one’s body, perception, mind, and mental objects causes one’s awareness to become sharp and stable. Practicing this type of “awareness care” can be used to purify the thoughts of the terminal patient; it is also the basic method of practice in Buddhism. According to “□r(96bb)vaka bh□mi” chapter of the Yog(96bb)c(96bb)rabh□mi, the relationship of mind and body in Buddhist meditation involves the fact that the growth of pliancy and serenity (pra□rabdhi) in mind and body and the growth of the one-pointedness of mind (ek(96bb)rat(96bb)) mutually influence each other. As pliancy and serenity in mind and body increases, a transformation of support (mind and body)occurs, in which the object of support is pure. As one-pointedness of mind increases, mental objects are transcended, and the wisdom of non-discrimination and direct perception arises with respect to the object of meditation or knowledge; thereby objects of perception become pure ((96bb)lambana-pari□uddhi). These are two indicators of accomplishment in Buddhist concentration. The above describes the experience of the theory and application of the relationship between mind and body in Buddhism, which may be helpful to modern society’s discussion of the science of life. | - |