趙城金藏目錄的探究與數位應用

Abstract

本論文的重點分為兩個大項，一、探究《指要錄》、《蔣唯心廣勝寺簡目》、《中華大藏經》、《北京圖書館趙城金藏》，以及《李富華金藏還原目錄》之異同，以瞭解《金藏》相關版本的差異性，進而得知其大致內涵。二、將匯整之經錄進行數位化，以利保存。保存的方式有很多種，譬如以XML標記語言將經典用TEI tag標出，使用標準化的標籤可方便流傳。 相較於其他版本之大藏經，《趙城金藏》所具豐富之學術價值，可分以下三點來說明：一、其為中國第一套雕刻版大藏經《開寶藏》的覆刻，《開寶藏》是我國北宋太祖開寶年間開刻的一部佛教大藏經，《趙城金藏》的存在再現了中國古代第一套刻本大藏經的原貌。而《趙城金藏》為現存最古老與珍貴之版本。二、其內容豐富，共有6980卷，為其他藏經所僅見的，其中包含了許多其他藏經所未收錄的經典。三、《金藏》的雕造乃金代崔法珍，斷臂誓願雕造的，過程極為艱辛，資金是村民募集捐獻而來，且雕造的年限歷時30年之久。此刻苦之心路歷程，所完成的一套大藏，應讓後人閱讀與學習。 本研究主要的進行方式，首先是用XML將經典目錄數位化，接下來是進行比對，比對的方式則是將《指要錄》、《蔣唯心廣勝寺簡目》、《中華大藏經》、《北京圖書館趙城金藏》、《李富華金藏還原目錄》此五部目錄進行比對，找出相同與相異的經典。 選用此五個版本為對象，主要是因為《指要錄》之內容與《金藏》大致相同，因此以《指要錄》為參考。蔣唯心的目錄，則是他親自到山西廣勝寺校閱原藏所訂定的。而《中華大藏經》也是以此版本為底本，加入其他藏經的經典而完成。再者，《北京圖書館趙城金藏》的出現，也讓吾人看到原刻本的內容。《李富華金藏還原目錄》則參考了《蔣唯心廣勝寺簡目》與《小野玄妙金藏目錄》等錄所成。 在研究方法上，也是分兩部分進行。一、整理文獻資料，了解此五部目錄的出現原由、歷史背景、彼此的關係。二、採用資訊方法進行分析，先用XML將目錄一筆一筆編出，以了解每一筆經典目錄為何。然後，利用link標籤將此五份目錄相同的經典目錄連結起來。連結完成後，撰寫Python程式轉為HTML檔案，如此在網頁上即可直接點選某部經典而看到相同的其他經典。 本論文的貢獻為數位化上述五套目錄，並建立比對表，將相同與相異的經典標出。用TEI的標籤將五套目錄編進XML檔案中，以利流通。另製作比對結果相同經典的網頁檔，可以顯示五部目錄相同經典的連結，提供讀者參考。

The importance of this thesis can be differentiates between two points: One, investigate the contents and relationships and the same and differences of old tripitaka catalogue and reorganize it. Two, digitize the organized catalogue and save it. The reason why we choose Jin dynasty tripitaka is its abounding values. About its values, we discuss it in three ways. First, because it is the copy of the first tripitaka Ｋai bao tzang，it represents the contents of the first tripitaka. And it is the second tripitaka, now it is the oldest and the most valuable edition which exists. Second, the contents are abundant. It has 6980 rolls, and some of them are seldom seen by the other tripitakas, so it includes many scriptures which are not seen in other tripitakas. Third, Jin dynasty tripitaka are valuable culture relics. Because when it is discovered, it is the printed books of old wood block and is not complete. For this, we should recover and maintain it. The carving of Jin dynasty tripitaka is not accidental. It is tsuei fa jen who cut her arm and vowed to crave it. The process was also hard. The founding was raised by villager. And the craving period of time last for thirty years. The hard craving process is valuable for us to study it. The main method of comparison of this thesis is to compare Zhi yao lu、Mr. Jiang’s catalogue,Chinese tripitaka、Beijing National Library jin tripitaka and Mr. Lee’s catalogue, using XML method. in order to find the same and the different part of the catalogues. The reasons we choose these five tripitakas as the targets are because the contents of Zhi yao lu are the same as the contents of Jin dynasty tripitaka, so we use Zhi yao lu as the reference. And the Mr. Jiang’s catalogue is revised by Mr. Jiang in Shanxi Guangsheng Temple and use Gao li tzang and Zhi yuan lu to mend it, part of the catalogues are real. Chinese nation tripitaka use Mr. Jiang’s edition as the original edition, and add other tripitaka’s scriptures to finish it. Also, the Beijing library Jin tripitaka let us see the actual copy of the wood block. Mr. Lee’s jin tripitaka consult Mr. Jiang’s catalogue and Sheau ye shyuan miao catalogue, and we use all these catalogues to investigate the same and difference Buddhist scriptures. The investigating method is also go through in two ways. First, read the related materials and realize these five catalogues’ situation, history, and the relationships between each other. Second, use computer method to analyze it. In this way, we use XML to record every single scripture, and we can recognize every scripture and the contents of Zhi yuan lu. Then, we use link tag to link the same scriptures of first four catalogues. It may be the same scriptures in four catalogues, or in three catalogues, or in two catalogues. After linking, we write Python file to convert it to HTML file. In this way, we can see the scriptures on the internet, and when we choose one of the scriptures, it will show the other same scriptures. For Mr. Lee’s jin tripitaka, Mr. Jiang’s catalogues, Chinese tripitaka ,Beijing National Library jin tripitaka, we make a comparison table to show the differences between them. And build the database of Mr. Lee’s jin tripitaka.